Which of the following is NOT a category of evidence for test validity?

Rater consistency is not categorized as a form of evidence for test validity. In the realm of test validity, the primary categories generally include evidence related to the content, criterion-related measures, and constructs that the test aims to assess.

Alignment with standards refers to how well the test measures what it is intended to measure according to established educational standards or curricular goals. This is crucial for establishing content validity, which indicates whether the test comprehensively covers the material it purports to evaluate.

Comparison with other measures involves evaluating a test's results against other established measures to determine its validity. This can help ascertain convergent and divergent validity, which informs whether a test behaves as expected in relation to other tests measuring similar or dissimilar constructs.

Accuracy in the response process relates to the reliability and fairness with which test tasks are executed and the degree to which the test accurately captures the intended constructs from the perspective of the individuals being assessed.

In contrast, rater consistency pertains to the reliability of scoring procedures, focusing on how consistent different raters are in assigning scores rather than being directly tied to the test's validity itself. Therefore, it does not fit within the primary frameworks used to establish or evaluate test validity.