Which statement about program evaluation models is true?

The statement about program evaluation models that is true is that they examine both the outcomes and processes. Program evaluation models are designed to provide a comprehensive analysis of educational programs or interventions by assessing not only the results or outcomes achieved (such as academic performance, behavioral changes, or skill acquisition) but also the processes involved in delivering those outcomes (such as methods of instruction, resource allocation, and participant engagement).

By considering both aspects, these models offer a more complete understanding of a program's effectiveness. This dual focus allows evaluators to identify what works well, what needs improvement, and how various components of a program interact to influence results. This information is critical for making informed decisions about program adjustments, improvements, and future implementations.

The other options reflect misconceptions about the scope and utility of program evaluation models. For instance, saying they can only focus on qualitative data ignores the fact that many models incorporate quantitative data as well, offering a more nuanced assessment. Additionally, asserting that the models assess students' social skills exclusively limits their purpose, as they are often used to evaluate a wide range of outcomes across various domains. Lastly, the notion that they are not useful for formative assessments overlooks the role that program evaluation can play in ongoing assessments intended to guide improvements during the implementation of